One of the most popular features of Everpix was the "memory lane" type feature, which showed people what they did one year prior by sending their photos of that particular day to their email. This unique feature is now used in popular mobile apps such as "Memoir" which connects to all your photo sources and makes it easy for you to share memories from different time periods with your friends.
However, even though Everpix looked promising for a while in the eyes of the investor, there were a few red flags that Everpix did not notice when they were trying to grow their company as a startup.
Red Flag 1: Did not think of the customer and only thought of development
During the time of growth for Everpix, the founders were focusing on developing smaller features that were part of their larger "grand plan" for the application. Instead, they should have capitalized on the new users they acquired and keep the application as is and focus on strategic pivots where they could bring in more users. Another great tool would be to use your early adaptors as a sound board to see how they could continually make the application better and more innovative. In a world where mobile photo applications are around every corner, they needed to be able to stand out above their competitors.Red Flag 2: Did not focus on growth
After two years of being in operation, Everpix had 55,000 users. However, the Everpix team focused on development instead of marketing and getting new users on their existing application. New features are nice, however you need users in order to bring in revenue to cover your costs. If Everpix decided to focus on growth of users rather than expanding the already popular application, they may have been able to grow a larger subscription base, lower their development costs, and increase their profit margins.Red Flag 3: Continued to pull in funding without a clear direction/pivot
One red flag of Everpix was their fundraising intake. VC's were continually giving Everpix funding to help them make it from month to month with their costs. However, the funding did not have a purpose. Where funding can be very helpful for a startup, the funding should also be used to help with the growth of the company, not helping it stay above water. The founders of the company continued to receive funding, even though they knew they were on a downward slope without any plan for a pivot. Funding at this time should have been focused on user growth, and not additional development for new features.Red Flag 4: Should have considered buyout options at first sign of potential downfall
Everpix had a golden ticket out of their growth problem. In 2011, Everpix was in acquisition conversations with both Dropbox (relatively new at the time) and Facebook. Everpix decided to decline these offers, and focused on an even larger acquisition option possibly down the road. Where the goal of being able to become a billion dollar company on your own is the best possible scenario, Everpix was an excellent acquisition option for big companies. Both Dropbox and Facebook had enough capital, user base, and personnel to help bring the application from a user base of 55,000 to millions of users.
Post Everpix
Everpix was the start of the photo application movement. Since the fall of Everpix, mobile applications such as Instagram have been acquired for large sums of money and have seen explosive growth because of the acquisitions. If Everpix made a few different decisions to focus on growth and understand their strategic acquisition potential we all might have an additional photo application on our smartphones today instead of Instagram or Snapchat.
No comments:
Post a Comment